Avoma vs Notta
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Avoma and Notta.
🏆
Verdict: Notta wins
Notta scores 4.2/5, edging out Avoma at 4.0/5. Multilingual teams and individual professionals who record meetings or interviews regularly and want capture, translation, summaries, and exportable deliverables in one subscription.
Avoma AI meeting assistant for notes, scheduling and coaching | Notta Transform audio to text with AI summaries | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.0 (1 review) | 4.2 (1 review) |
| Pricing Model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting Price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best For | Sales and revenue teams that want meeting notes written into the CRM automatically and coaching signals from calls, without enterprise call-intelligence prices. | Multilingual teams and individual professionals who record meetings or interviews regularly and want capture, translation, summaries, and exportable deliverables in one subscription. |
| Free Tier | ||
| API Access | ||
| Team Features | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Tags | free tierteam features | mobile appapi accessfree tier |
| Visit Avoma → | Visit Notta → |
Avoma
Pros
- + Auto-save notes to CRM records and dialer integration are included even on the $19 Startup tier — not gated behind add-ons
- + Only recorder seats are billed; viewers and collaborators are free, which cut my sample 12-person team price to 8 seats
- + Published, readable pricing: $19/$24/$39 tiers plus $29 Conversation and Revenue Intelligence and $19 Lead Router add-ons (annual, at time of writing)
- + 14-day trial is genuinely unrestricted with all add-ons enabled, per the pricing page
- + Topic-structured summaries and Ask Avoma queries returned correct specifics on commitments and objections in my sample calls
Cons
- - Full sales stack (Organization + all add-ons) reaches $101/recorder seat/month billed annually — closer to rivals than the headline suggests
- - Non-sales teams pay for a lot of sales machinery; setup of CRM mapping, topic taxonomies and routing rules takes real ownership
- - Startup caps at 25 paid seats, Organization at 100, Enterprise requires 10 seats minimum and annual billing only
- - "Unlimited transcription and notes" has no published fair-use asterisk — get heavy-usage terms in writing
- - Translation is listed on Organization but the supported-language list is not published on the pricing page
Notta
Pros
- + Bot-free desktop capture records system audio plus microphone with no meeting bot joining Zoom, Teams, Meet, or Slack calls — in my use this removed the consent conversation from client meetings entirely
- + Widest language coverage in the category I test: 58 transcription languages, 23 bilingual live pairs, 80 real-time translation targets
- + Pro annual at $8.17/month for 1,800 minutes works out around $0.0045 per audio minute at time of writing (notta.ai pricing page), cheaper than most rivals
- + Practical export set — TXT, DOCX, PDF, SRT, XLSX — with a clean SRT I dropped straight into a video editor and clickable timestamps in the transcript
- + Documented security posture: SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 attestations, plus local offline transcription via Pro Privacy Mode on macOS 13+/Windows 10+
Cons
- - Free plan caps every conversation at 3 minutes, which rules out the main use case for a transcription tool and tests the interface rather than the workflow
- - Real-time translation is a paid add-on from $6/month at time of writing with only 2 free uses a month; bilingual transcription gets 4 free uses
- - Custom vocabulary covers only English and Japanese, so domain terminology in other languages gets no recognition help
- - The 98.86% accuracy figure is a vendor claim under optimal conditions; diarization stumbled on overlapping speakers and heavy accents in my testing and third-party reports
- - Monthly-billing prices disagree between Notta's pricing page and help centre ($13.99 vs $13.49 for Pro) and are hard to find on the site at all
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Avoma or Notta?▼
Notta scores higher at 4.2/5 vs 4.0/5 for Avoma, making it the better-rated option in our comparison.
What is the difference between Avoma and Notta?▼
Avoma: Avoma records and transcribes meetings, writes the notes, updates the CRM and coaches sales teams from the calls. Notta: AI-powered transcription tool that converts audio and video content into accurate text with intelligent summaries across multiple platforms.
Is Avoma or Notta more affordable?▼
Avoma starts at €0/mo, Notta starts at €0/mo. Check the comparison table above for current pricing.
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.