Amp vs GitHub Copilot
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Amp and GitHub Copilot.
🏆
Verdict: GitHub Copilot wins
GitHub Copilot scores 4.3/5, edging out Amp at 3.8/5. Developers already working in the GitHub ecosystem who want AI help in every editor they use plus an agent that opens pull requests.
Amp AI coding agent by Anthropic alumni | GitHub Copilot Your AI pair programmer | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.8 (1 review) | 4.3 (1 review) |
| Pricing Model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting Price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best For | Senior, terminal-comfortable developers who want unattended agents on remote machines and are happy to fund them with linked subscriptions and their own keys. | Developers already working in the GitHub ecosystem who want AI help in every editor they use plus an agent that opens pull requests. |
| Free Tier | ||
| API Access | ||
| Team Features | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Tags | free tierbyok | free tierteam features |
| Visit Amp → | Visit GitHub Copilot → |
Amp
Pros
- + Orb workflow is real: I dispatched an environment-setup and test-green task to a remote orb, closed the laptop, and resumed from another machine with the work done
- + No Amp token fees or limits — BYOK and linked ChatGPT/Claude/X subscriptions run at subscription cost, and self-hosted orbs and own runners are free on every tier
- + Teams workspaces add SSO (SAML/OIDC), shared billing, pooled credits and shared BYOK routing at no extra seat charge
- + Transparent per-action economics: credits at provider API prices with no markup for individuals, published tier allowances (45,000 minutes on Megawatt), and clearly stated orb sizes
- + Genuinely unattended parallelism — agents in separate orbs with their own repo clones and tooling, so no worktree juggling or port conflicts in my runs
Cons
- - Orb minutes burn while agents idle: a slow install consumed my allowance at the same per-minute rate as active work, and I found no per-workload spend cap
- - Hobby has no included orb time or agent usage — 'free' means your tokens and your own machines
- - Custom endpoint URLs and gateway routing (OpenRouter, Bedrock, Azure Foundry) are early access for paid tiers behind an experimental flag, with no public rollout date
- - Homegrown vocabulary (orbs, portals, the Dial) and a terminal-first surface make onboarding deliberately steep for GUI-oriented developers
- - Amp's published 60–65% average usage discount is a vendor claim without a stated basis; included usage does not roll over month to month
GitHub Copilot
Pros
- + Unmetered code completions and Next Edit Suggestions on every plan — my credit balance never moved during a full day of passively-assisted coding
- + Widest surface coverage in the category: VS Code, Visual Studio, JetBrains, Xcode, github.com, Mobile, Windows Terminal, desktop app and CLI
- + Coding agent works inside GitHub's review loop — assigned issue in, reviewable pull request out, in my testing
- + Free tier is genuine: 2,000 completions/month, Copilot CLI, and free Pro for verified students, teachers and popular OSS maintainers
- + Credits are transparent per model at listed API rates (docs.github.com), with 1,500 total monthly credits on the $10 Pro plan
Cons
- - Fallback to cheaper models when you run out was removed in the 2026-06-01 usage-based transition — credits run out, work stops or you top up
- - Annual Pro/Pro+ subscribers stay on old premium-request pricing until expiry, then drop to Copilot Free unless they actively upgrade
- - In-editor context is narrower than Cursor's repo-indexed agent on large codebases in my experience
- - Requires a GitHub account throughout; no support for GitHub Enterprise Server
- - Some premium models (Claude Fable 5/5.1) retain data by default per the docs, with ZDR access for approved enterprises only through end of 2026
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Amp or GitHub Copilot?▼
GitHub Copilot scores higher at 4.3/5 vs 3.8/5 for Amp, making it the better-rated option in our comparison.
What is the difference between Amp and GitHub Copilot?▼
Amp: Amp is a coding agent and development environment from Sourcegraph that runs unattended tasks in the cloud or locally through a CLI. GitHub Copilot: GitHub Copilot suggests and writes code in the editor and acts as a coding agent on GitHub, reviewing and completing tasks in a repository.
Is Amp or GitHub Copilot more affordable?▼
Amp starts at €0/mo, GitHub Copilot starts at €0/mo. Check the comparison table above for current pricing.
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.