Aikido Security vs GitGuardian
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Aikido Security and GitGuardian.
🏆
Verdict: GitGuardian wins
GitGuardian scores 4.2/5, edging out Aikido Security at 4.1/5. Engineering and security teams of any size that want secrets detection before code merges — starting free for teams up to 25 developers and scaling to governed, self-hostable remediation on Enterprise.
Aikido Security Developer-friendly AI application security | GitGuardian Detect and remediate secrets leaked in your git repositories | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.1 (1 review) | 4.2 (1 review) |
| Pricing Model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting Price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best For | Startups and scale-ups that want broad code-to-cloud security scanning with AI-suggested fixes, published pricing and a real free tier, without hiring an AppSec team. | Engineering and security teams of any size that want secrets detection before code merges — starting free for teams up to 25 developers and scaling to governed, self-hostable remediation on Enterprise. |
| Free Tier | ||
| API Access | ||
| Team Features | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Tags | free tierapi access | free tierteam featuresopen source |
| Visit Aikido Security → | Visit GitGuardian → |
Aikido Security
Pros
- + Free Developer plan is genuinely usable (10 repos, 2 users, SCA/SAST/secrets/IaC/DAST) — no credit card, read-only scans, and a demo repo to evaluate without your own code
- + Minutes-to-first-finding onboarding with PR-based Autofix; fixes preview as diffs and never merge without developer review
- + Published flat pricing — Basic and Pro tiers visible at about $300 and $600 per month including 10 users at time of writing — plus startup discounts and AWS/Azure Marketplace purchase options
- + Breadth unusual at the price: SCA with reachability, SAST, secrets with liveness detection, IaC, containers/VMs, CSPM, DAST, and SBOM export in CycloneDX/SPDX/CSV
Cons
- - Per-engine depth trails specialists — SAST rule maturity and language coverage are not Checkmarx-class on large polyglot monorepos
- - Every tier meters repos, images, domains, cloud accounts, AutoFixes and protected requests; the free plan's 10 AutoFixes/month ran out quickly in my evaluation
- - Cloud/CSPM features are companion coverage, not a full CNAPP replacement for large multi-cloud estates
- - Young vendor: enterprise compliance and support processes are still maturing relative to incumbents
GitGuardian
Pros
- + The free tier is genuinely operational: 25 developers, unlimited real-time scanning, and 500 historical scan detections — I found committed test credentials in a small repo within minutes of setup
- + ggshield is open source and installs as pre-commit hook, GitHub Action, or CLI — wiring prevention into a pipeline took me under half an hour
- + Detection honesty: the docs openly describe the precision/recall trade-off instead of promising zero false positives
- + API quota is request-based and documented (10K/month free, 1M on business plans), so CI usage costs are calculable before you automate
- + AI IDE hooks (Claude Code, Cursor, Copilot CLI, VS Code, Codex and others) push prevention to where agents now write code
Cons
- - It does not rotate or revoke credentials — remediation playbooks route incidents to humans; the catalog's 'automated rotation' claim is wrong
- - On the free tier, alert triage is manual: AI risk scoring and false-positive filtering are Growth-only
- - Custom regex detectors are Enterprise-only, so proprietary credential formats need the top tier
- - Pricing for Growth and Enterprise is quote-only with no published rates — hard to budget without a sales call
- - Historical scan caps on free (500 detections, 1 GB repo capacity) mean large legacy repos must pay before seeing their full backlog
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Aikido Security or GitGuardian?▼
GitGuardian scores higher at 4.2/5 vs 4.1/5 for Aikido Security, making it the better-rated option in our comparison.
What is the difference between Aikido Security and GitGuardian?▼
Aikido Security: Application security platform combining SAST, SCA, container scanning, and secrets detection with AI fixes for developers. GitGuardian: GitGuardian scans code, repositories and developer tooling for leaked credentials and helps teams revoke and fix them. It also covers non-human identity governance, and runs as SaaS or self-hosted.
Is Aikido Security or GitGuardian more affordable?▼
Aikido Security starts at €0/mo, GitGuardian starts at €0/mo. Check the comparison table above for current pricing.
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.