TestFit vs Polycam
A detailed comparison to help you choose between TestFit and Polycam.
⚖️
How to choose
Neither tool has user reviews on ToolSpotter yet, so we don't pick a winner. Compare them on what they're built for: TestFit — Real estate developers, architects, and contractors screening multifamily, industrial, or parking-heavy deals at volume who need feasibility answers with a pro forma attached.; Polycam — Architects, contractors and facility teams with LiDAR iPhones who need phone-scanned floor plans, measurements and CAD-ready exports without a scanning crew..
TestFit AI building feasibility and site planning | Polycam AI 3D scanning from your phone | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.0 (1 review) | 4.0 (1 review) |
| Pricing Model | paid | freemium |
| Starting Price | From $300/mo | Free tier available |
| Best For | Real estate developers, architects, and contractors screening multifamily, industrial, or parking-heavy deals at volume who need feasibility answers with a pro forma attached. | Architects, contractors and facility teams with LiDAR iPhones who need phone-scanned floor plans, measurements and CAD-ready exports without a scanning crew. |
| Free Tier | ||
| API Access | ||
| Team Features | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Tags | team features | free tiermobile app |
| Visit TestFit → | Visit Polycam → |
TestFit
Pros
- + Live re-ranking of schemes against yield, FAR, and unit count turned a change I made to the unit mix into a re-scored shortlist within seconds
- + Generative design produces thousands of ranked scheme variations in seconds, so discarding bad options costs almost nothing
- + Pro Forma stays bound to the geometry — layout edits move return on cost without a separate spreadsheet pass
- + Parking Solver at $175/month billed annually includes unlimited users, which is unusual at this price point
- + Export paths to AutoCAD (DXF), SketchUp (SKP), Revit, glTF, CSV, and PDF make the handoff to design teams straightforward
Cons
- - Generative design sits behind Site Solver at $10,000+/year, so small practices are effectively priced out
- - Output is feasibility-grade: unit plans show zones and approximate dimensions, not designed rooms
- - Manual override mode is clunky when you need exact placements — the same complaint shows up in G2 and Capterra reviews
- - US-centric zoning and code framing; data layers like parcels and flood zones may be missing outside the US
- - Independent reviewers report struggles on small irregular urban lots and occasional glitches or crashes
Polycam
Pros
- + LiDAR Space Mode produced an editable 2D floor plan with auto-labeled rooms within seconds of finishing a scan in my test of a two-bedroom flat
- + Export round-trips worked: layered DXF floor plans opened with scale and layers intact in a CAD viewer, and OBJ/USDZ meshes imported cleanly
- + Five capture modes (Object, Space, Floorplan, AI Capture, 360) cover objects, interiors and documentation in one app instead of three tools
- + Business tier allows up to 2,000 images and 30 minutes of video per capture — enough resolution in my mechanical-room test to reconstruct reflective pipework that smaller captures smeared
- + Free tier is usable for real experimentation: limited captures, GLTF export and public link sharing at $0
Cons
- - Floor plans and the measurement layer require a LiDAR device — the same scan on a non-LiDAR phone returned only a mesh in my testing
- - Basic's 300-image capture ceiling cut short my photogrammetry coverage of a display cabinet mid-capture
- - Measurement accuracy is undocumented against survey standards; fine for as-builts, not for contractual tolerances
- - Processing and floor-plan generation are server-side, so disconnected sites become a capture-now-process-later workflow
- - Subscription-only (the vendor pricing FAQ rules out one-time purchase), with floor plans, point clouds and shared libraries gated at Business ($400/year per user)
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, TestFit or Polycam?▼
It depends on your specific needs — neither tool has user reviews on ToolSpotter yet, so we don't rank one above the other. TestFit is best for: Real estate developers, architects, and contractors screening multifamily, industrial, or parking-heavy deals at volume who need feasibility answers with a pro forma attached.. Polycam is best for: Architects, contractors and facility teams with LiDAR iPhones who need phone-scanned floor plans, measurements and CAD-ready exports without a scanning crew..
What is the difference between TestFit and Polycam?▼
TestFit: TestFit generates and compares building site layouts against constraints and financial targets, for real estate feasibility studies. Polycam: Polycam captures 3D scans, floor plans and measurements using a phone camera or LiDAR, and exports them to CAD and BIM formats.
Is TestFit or Polycam more affordable?▼
TestFit starts at €300/mo, Polycam starts at €0/mo. Check the comparison table above for current pricing.
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.