Activepieces vs Trigger.dev

A detailed comparison to help you choose between Activepieces and Trigger.dev.

🏆

Verdict: Trigger.dev wins

Trigger.dev scores 4.4/5, edging out Activepieces at 4.0/5. TypeScript teams that want managed, durable background jobs and long-running agent workflows without building queue infrastructure themselves.

Activepieces

Activepieces

Open-source Zapier alternative

Trigger.dev

Trigger.dev

Open-source workflow automation platform for AI agents and integrations

Rating4.0 (1 review)4.4 (1 review)
Pricing Modelfreemiumfreemium
Starting PriceFrom $16/moFree tier available
Best ForCost-conscious teams and security-sensitive orgs that want Zapier-style workflows with true open-source licensing and self-hosting.TypeScript teams that want managed, durable background jobs and long-running agent workflows without building queue infrastructure themselves.
Free Tier
API Access
Team Features
Open Source
Tags
open sourcefree tier
free tieropen sourceapi access
Visit Activepieces →Visit Trigger.dev →

Activepieces

Pros

  • + MIT-licensed and self-hostable on every tier — the only truly open-source platform in this batch (community edition on GitHub)
  • + Pricing is flat and predictable: Plus is $20/mo flat for 10,000 credits with $0.007/credit overage at time of writing (activepieces.com/pricing)
  • + Docker self-host came up in under fifteen minutes in my test, and flows imported cleanly between cloud and self-hosted
  • + Bring-your-own AI keys on Plus means model spend goes to your provider unmarked-up
  • + Same piece code runs cloud or self-hosted, so community connector fixes apply everywhere (760+ integrations claimed)

Cons

  • - Connector depth trails Zapier badly in the long tail — two niche apps I needed had no piece and no ready HTTP template
  • - Free plan resets credits daily and pauses work when exhausted; unusable for anything production-grade
  • - Feature parity between self-hosted community and cloud is incomplete — one agent feature I wanted was cloud-only at time of writing
  • - Advanced governance (audit logs, SCIM, secret managers, custom RBAC) sits behind custom Ultimate pricing
  • - Small team with modest funding (~$1.55M reported) — rapid shipping means UI and docs drift out of sync in places
View full Activepiecesreview →

Trigger.dev

Pros

  • + Checkpoint-resume is real: my two-day paused approval run resumed instantly and billed zero compute while waiting
  • + Tasks are plain async functions in your own repo — no DSL, no determinism rules, and warm starts measured in the 100–300ms band the changelog advertises
  • + Free tier includes $5 usage credit and dev runs are free; my 800ms-run fan-out at 10k/month cost under a dollar of compute
  • + Open-source Apache-2.0 with the same codebase on Cloud and self-hosted, and an unusually active release line (v4.5.12 as of August 2026)
  • + Full workflow surface built in: retries, queues, scheduling, idempotency, priority, lifecycle hooks, wait tokens and AI-SDK tool integration

Cons

  • - TypeScript/JavaScript only — Python and Go teams are simply not served
  • - Production self-hosting means Postgres, Redis, webapp and worker containers plus a build tunnel; the docs get thin exactly where ops gets hard
  • - The plan fee is a usage credit, not a ceiling — LLM-heavy agent runs can outrun the included allowance without cost modelling
  • - v3 is shut down on Cloud (old triggers and deploys no longer run), and the v3→v4 migration has sharp edges for busy projects
  • - Concurrency and log-retention limits bite early (1-day logs on Free), and the 'AI agents' marketing outruns what is fundamentally an execution platform
View full Trigger.devreview →

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Activepieces or Trigger.dev?▼
Trigger.dev scores higher at 4.4/5 vs 4.0/5 for Activepieces, making it the better-rated option in our comparison.
What is the difference between Activepieces and Trigger.dev?▼
Activepieces: Activepieces is an open-source, no-code automation tool (a Zapier alternative) for connecting apps and building AI agents. You can self-host it; cloud plan is free, then from $16/mo. Trigger.dev: Trigger.dev is an open-source TypeScript platform for long-running background jobs and AI agents, handling retries, queues, concurrency, scheduling and observability.
Is Activepieces or Trigger.dev more affordable?▼
Activepieces starts at €16/mo, Trigger.dev starts at €0/mo. Check the comparison table above for current pricing.

Stay in the loop

Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.